
Charming. The very near end of summer in Belgium. Brussels. No real FINE weather we’ve seen, a summer we may forget for not having really ‘happened’. The leaves on the trees far from withered by dry winds and scorching sun – 28th of August – not at all beaten, broken, overpowered. This charming anti-folk band in the park, playing in the dark. They are playing only old CRASS songs. Revivalists, warming up punk phraseology. They do it with much musical skill and warmth, and the large crowd seems stirred. These strong messages from recent times keep coming back one after another, in various, numerous ways. Most recently encore, we witnessed the commemoration of events around 1968 (like in Paris). We saw journal’s pages being filled with epoch-making commentaries and analyses. There were even small posters in the streets, ’68-style (charming), repeating and transforming the old way of protesting for our times. I found one example rather effective.
The ‘anti-folk’-word, I got that out of critic’s pages. Surely some band member must have dropped it and some critic must have picked it up. Useful word.
Big A, little A, bouncing B
The system might have got you but it won't get me
What I liked about the singer’s announcement at the start of the concert, was his apparent uncertainty about the motive for doing this particular exercise.
What's the point of preaching peace if it's something you don't feel?
What's the point of talking love if you think that love ain't real?
Where's the hope in hopelessness? Where's the truth in lies?
Don't try to hold my hand if you can't look me in the eyes.
Is it digesting of past prophecies? Yes, it is. Is it being done in a charming way? Yes, rather so. Do I believe in charm? Yes I do. I believe.
It must certainly feel good, to retell a story that was told under quite different circumstances, back then around 1977.
Back then, it came from angry intestines that mouthed truth in a much more frank manner than nowadays could ever be imagined, that means if the present speaker would more or less care about his or her credibility. Everything seems to have become more complex now to convey, we need more words, and more space between the words, wherein the depths are deeper and steeper and more perilous than before. Nothing - it is a well known saying - can stay the same.
But to go back a few steps once in a while, only to be able to spew truths in a blissfully direct way, is a faculty to cherish, and it gives some relief from the edgy questions that ever-present-day efforts demand of us descriptors and poets.
Entrails and intestines have got a raw version of things stocked up. Now that the planet is still friendly here, it is luxury to be able to hint at such raw stuff during a subsidized moment of cultural non-censored expression. It is like watching a flower in a picture-book. Because the more earth becomes overtly dangerous and unliveable and hostile, the more the amount of gut reactions - no more second thoughts - will increase with it.